Thestar.com
Golfers, elk fight for greens as Canmore ponders its future
Chris Welner
SPECIAL TO THE STAR
View from the West

CANMORE, Alta.- IT TOOK the forces of nature hundreds of millions of years to shape Western Canada's Rocky Mountains, but a development push from modern man is drastically reshaping one mountain community and its wildlife habitat over little more than the next decade.

Canmore is enduring a growth spurt that would rip the insides out of even the most well-adjusted teenager. Less than 11,000 people live in the town, which sits beside Banff National Park, nestled in the Bow River Valley under the watchful guard of Three Sisters Mountain.

Half of the people who call Canmore home have made the pilgrimage here within the last five years.

Now Calgary real estate company TGS Properties Ltd. wants to triple the town's population.

TGS breathed new life into Canmore's private development plans in 1999 when it paid $12 million to a financially troubled company for a half interest in 1,455 hectares known as the Three Sisters Mountain Village. The Stewart Creek Golf Resort on the site opened last summer. If TGS's plans go through, the property would also support 4,200 new homes, two new golf courses and a resort village.

The project will virtually define the town's future shape. The Three Sisters' massive tract of forest makes up 80 per cent of Canmore's developable land.

And conservationists say the development, particularly the golf courses, would do irreparable harm to the region's migrating wildlife.

The town began to wrestle with these questions in 1992, when the provincial Natural Resources Conservation Board looked at how development would affect the Three Sisters tract. Its report, released the following year, allowed for development on 730 of the property's 1,455 hectares but insisted on conditions. It required that corridors be set aside so the region's grizzlies, elk and cougars could maintain their habitat, which stretches from Kananaskis Provincial Park in the east to Banff in the west, and beyond.

TGS says it has followed these conditions in its plans for the total property. A primary wildlife corridor for carnivorous animals such as bears, wolves and cougars has been reserved on the edge of the Three Sisters property. Secondary corridors through the golf courses would be a thoroughfare for ungulates - including elk, moose, deer and the snowshoe hare. The fairways themselves are being classified as part of the corridor.

Provincial authorities say the corridor plan meets the guidelines' criteria.

Meanwhile, a report commissioned by the province on the impact of golf course development on wildlife, has found that animals and golfers can co-exist, but are fundamentally at odds. The report was done by the Miistakis Institute for the Rockies, an ecological consulting group.

``Golf courses and wildlife corridors are compatible as long as nobody plays golf,'' says Heather MacFadyen, a community health-care researcher who moved to Canmore from Calgary a year ago. ``They can't co-exist any more than you could have a wildlife corridor down Main Street. There are people in it.''

Canmore was removed from the protection of Banff National Park in 1930 so industry could further mine the Bow Valley's coal reserves. In 1951, a hydro generator was commissioned on the nearby Spray Lakes. When mining died in 1979, the town dried up with it, shrinking to about 2,000 people. But the 1988 Winter Olympic Games turned the tide, when the cross-country ski events were held at the Canmore Nordic Centre.

The picture is brighter still today. With the picturesque tourist town of Banff developed to the limit, the lump-of-coal Canmore is being turned into a Rocky Mountain diamond.

But will the pressure of that transformation be too much to bear for a small mountain town with a folksy rough edge. Tourism has been identified as the key to Canmore's future. Hikers, mountain-bikers, skiers and golfers visit year 'round.

Mayor Ron Casey says the town must first decide what kind of place it wants to be, and use that as a framework for how much future development to approve and when. ``We need development to occur, but we have to understand why people come here. It's the natural environment around us and the small town community feeling we have. If we destroy the wildlife or the community, then we've lost a piece of the puzzle that makes us attractive. It's an extremely delicate balance.''

Canmore draws more than tourists. Many people have moved from Calgary to enjoy mountain life and make the daily 100-kilometre commute to work. Canmore is also the favoured bedroom community for people who work in Banff, 20 kilometres west on the Trans Canada Highway. Still others, from places like Toronto and Texas, have bought vacation homes that average $300,000.

Ian Hogg, vice-president of TGS Properties, is anxious for municipal approval and a final go-ahead from the province so he can get the first 256 lots and show homes up for sale this summer. He says his company has met every condition laid out by the conservation board and accuses the development's critics of NIMBYism. ``There are a lot of people who claim knowledge but can't back it up with science. We're trying to establish some science,'' he says. ``We have an intensive wildlife-monitoring program with staff biologists budgeted about $250,000 a year. If we find we're having an impact as development proceeds, we'll bring the science to bear.''

Gareth Thomson, education director for the Canadian Parks and Wilderness society, says the TGS plan has a potentially fatal flaw that's not unique to Three Sisters. If you take a national park and surround it by development, the park starts to function as an island - a virtual Alcatraz for its native species, he says. ``That's what's at risk for any park in North America.''

While Canmore is not pristine wilderness, it has wildlife that are vulnerable. ``We're trying to plan for the future here. We're talking the next 100 years, so you need to be careful. There is a strong possibility of loving this place to death.

``All of the work we've been doing for decades goes for nothing if Three Sisters fumbles the ball, if wildlife can't get across Three Sisters property. And they won't do that if there are golf courses in those darn corridors. Let's call them habituated elk corridors, because those are the only animals that will use them.''

In Banff, there are about 80 incidents a year of elk, weighing up to 1,000 pounds each, charging or being aggressive with humans.

It's common to see dozens of them lounging on the fairways at the Banff Springs Hotel golf course.

On the Three Sisters property, bears were spotted at least twice in the past two weeks roaming Stewart Creek Golf Course and were steered back into the woods by conservation officers. Mountain bikers and hikers who use primary corridor land are as much at risk as golfers.

``Nobody has had the opportunity to fully assess these wildlife corridors,'' Casey says. ``But once you have development, you aren't going to undo the development.''

At an open house on May 23, a draft Conservation Easement Agreement that the province had negotiated with Three Sisters Inc. was unveiled. As well as plans for the wildlife corridors, it outlined ecological monitoring programs, including animal migration and a Wildlife Human Interaction Prevention (WHIP) plan that would allow conservation officers to restrict human access if there are problems with wildlife. The provincial government is assessing public reaction.

Dave Ealey of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, a provincial government department, says there's nothing wrong with the TGS plan.

``Detractors may not want development, but this is private property.''


Chris Welner is a freelance writer based in Calgary.




Legal Notice:- Copyright 1996-2002. Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from http://www.thestar.com/ is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form.